[Mark S.] v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (M.D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2023) - adult disabled child's case, young adult claim 3) The ALJ’s stated reasons

3) The ALJ’s stated reasons for discrediting Plaintiff’s testimony is not based on substantial evidence

CV 3:21-00750

Treating physician’s opinion (old law) - need for genuine inconsistency

decision and instead

RFC - limitations from migraine headaches

[Mark S.] v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (M.D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2023) - adult disabled child's case, young adult claim 3) The ALJ’s stated reasons[Mark S.] v. Commr of Soc. Sec., No. 8: 22 CV 785 DNF, 2023 WL 5091355 (M. D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2023) (Decision by U. S. Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier, by consent) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff's Memorandum and Plaintiff's Reply Brief Topics addressed: Adult child's disability benefits Establishing onset Prior claim file RFC failure to include credited opinions RFC relationship with PRTF findings RFC interacting with others oung adult claims parents