![[William N.] v. Kijakazi (E.D. Mo. Mar. 21, 2022) - migraine headaches, RFC - reliance on outdated assessments of the State agency medical consultants are not based on substantial](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0027/8170/8349/files/istockphoto-1405452812-612x612.jpg?v=1715264582)
Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $18.75 Learn more
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 27 - Oct 2
are not based on substantial evidence
the ALJ had an ‘affirmative obligation’ to ‘attempt[ ] to fill any clear gaps in the administrative record’ created by inconsistencies in the medical opinions — for example
Definition of medical source opinion
” Consequently
2) The ALJ’s residual functional capacity (“RFC”) assessment is not supported by substantial evidence
[William N.] v. Kijakazi (E.D. Mo. Mar. 21, 2022) - migraine headaches, RFC - reliance on outdated assessments of the State agency medical consultants are not based on substantial[William N.] v. Kijakazi, No. 4: 20 CV 1422 CDP, 2022 WL 832328 (E. D. Mo. Mar. 21, 2022) (Decision by U. S. District Judge Catherine D. Perry) Briefs Included: Plaintiffs Brief, Plaintiffs Statement of Uncontroverted Facts, and Plaintiffs Reply Brief Topics addressed: Listing medical equivalence ALJ must build an accurate and logical bridge from the evidence to his conclusion RFC lack of support for findings RFC reliance on outdated assessments of
