![[Angela S.] v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Oct. 24, 2024) - medical opinions, RFC – reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, sentence six new evidence remand EAJA - reasonableness of hours](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0027/8170/8349/files/istockphoto-1405452812-612x612_1024x1024_2x_2d000ff1-b222-4c16-b617-3861e33c5449.webp?v=1753464283)
Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $18.75 Learn more
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 18 - Sep 23
EAJA - reasonableness of hours - briefing time
Includes one case where the effectively hourly rate was $9
2) The ALJ’s mental RFC finding is deficient as it failed to address any limitations in interacting with supervisors
Yet any mention of Simon’s most serious symptoms is conspicuously missing from the ALJ’s decision
Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Supporting Memorandum of Law and Plaintiff’s Reply Brief
[Angela S.] v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Oct. 24, 2024) - medical opinions, RFC – reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, sentence six new evidence remand EAJA - reasonableness of hours[Angela S.] v. OMalley, No. CV 23 22441 (RK), 2024 WL 4563910 (D. N. J. Oct. 24, 2024) (Decision by U. S. District Judge Robert Kirsch) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief, Plaintiffs Reply Brief and court decision Topics addressed: Medical opinions supportability Medical opinions consistency Medical opinions articulation requirements RFC reliance on ALJs lay interpretation of the record Sentence six remands due to new evidence Ruling addressed:
US$ 120.00
US$ 18.00
US$ 44.00
US$ 35.50
US$ 26.50
US$ 45.00
US$ 25.00
US$ 82.00
US$ 38.00
US$ 17.00
US$ 160.00
US$ 23.00
US$ 38.00
