Nikita M. v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Feb. 21, 2024) - interacting with supervisors, medical opinions, subjective complaints, lay evidence, sentence 6 remands Acquiescence Ruling 97-4(9)

Acquiescence Ruling 97-4(9)

2023 WL 2136429 (M

Medical opinions - articulation requirements

2:24-CV-10888 (D

2)  The ALJ failed to set forth the requisite “specific and legitimate reasons” for not crediting the findings of two examining physicians

Nikita M. v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Feb. 21, 2024) - interacting with supervisors, medical opinions, subjective complaints, lay evidence, sentence 6 remands Acquiescence Ruling 97-4(9)Nikita M. v. OMalley, No. 2: 23 CV 10722 (D. N. J. Feb. 21, 2024) (Order by U. S. Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief and remand order Topics addressed: RFC interacting with co workers, supervisors and the public Medical opinions supportability Medical opinions articulation requirements Testimony of lay witnesses Subjective symptoms regulatory factors Subjective symptoms required finding Mental domains interacting