S.R. v. O’Malley (D.N.J. July 31, 2024) - RFC - assistive device, past work, right to cross-examine VE the court found such objective

the court found such objective evidence was present in this case

The court concluded that the ALJ “did not articulate adequate reasons for discounting this evidence

2)  The ALJ failed to properly evaluate Jose P

In a 39-page opinion

Weight of evidence from a consultative provider (old law)

S.R. v. O’Malley (D.N.J. July 31, 2024) - RFC - assistive device, past work, right to cross-examine VE the court found such objective. R. v. OMalley, Case No. 1: 23 cv 03004 KMW (D. N. J. July 31, 2024) (Decision by U. S. District Judge Karen M. Williams) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief, Plaintiffs Reply Brief and remand order Topics addressed: RFC lack of support for findings RFC assistive device RFC manipulative limitations RFC need to consider severe and non severe impairments Past relevant work lack of support for RFC assessment Vocational testimony right to examine